AMARA OKAFOR
FOLLOW THE QUESTION.
STUDY 09

Access Without Arrival

"What happens when the journey is technically possible but never taken."

DRAFTData & Inequality2026
Location
Lagos
Period
2026 (ongoing)
Research Area
Data & Inequality
SIZE: WIDTH:

Context

A study within the Data & Inequality area of Dr. Okafor's wider research on daily mobility and access to opportunity, conducted in Lagos over 2026 (ongoing).

The Question

QUESTION

"If a journey is theoretically accessible but residents rarely take it, does it count as access at all?"

Hypothesis

HYPOTHESIS

A measurable share of 'reachable' destinations are functionally inaccessible because the journey's cost, in time or money, discourages residents from ever attempting it.

Method

Data

Findings

A meaningful share of theoretically reachable destinations are rarely visited at all.

PRELIMINARY CONFIDENCE
Sample
1,860 households
Method
Variable
reachable-but-unvisited destinations
Observation
Early results suggest a notable gap between destinations classified as reachable by travel-time thresholds and destinations households actually report visiting.

What We Know / What We Still Don't Know

WHAT WE KNOW

Reachability on a map and access in practice are not the same thing.

WHAT WE STILL DON'T KNOW

How large this gap is city-wide, and which factor — cost, time, or unfamiliarity — explains most of it.

Publication

This study has not yet produced a publication record.